For the past several years, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been in bed with an organization that "hates" patriotic Americans, hates the Constitution, and hates the rule of law. According to the SPLC, the FIRE Coalition is the largest "nativist extremist" group in the country. I won't even begin to list all the lies they have promulgated about our organization in their so-called "Intelligence Reports," but suffice to say, there's not much intelligence there to report with. I could go into greater detail, but a lady in Washington State said it very well Thursday in a letter to the Pottawattamie County Emergency Management Agency (PCEMA) for their outlandish "Operation Closed Campus" exercise. God Bless you Lynn for telling it like it is. When you're done reading Ms. Stuter's letter, read Tom DeWeese's report that he presented on Feb. 17, 2011 in the House Judiciary at a briefing coordinated by the FIRE Coalition and Patriot Coalition for the House Tea Party Caucus and House Immigration Reform Caucus.
I will be personally delivering this message to House & Senate Tea Party Members in Des Moines, Iowa on Saturday at the Conservative Principles Conference hosted by Congressman Steve King, (IA-5).
Jeff Lewis, PatriotWatchdog
National Director, FIRE Coalition & Patriot Coalition
SAMPLE LETTERS TO YOUR CONGRESSMAN / SENATORS
From: "Lynn M Stuter"
Subject: GN: Operation Closed Campus; Pottawattamie County, Iowa;
March 26, 2011
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:36:06 -0700
My letter to the "exercise team", Operation Closed Campus.
From: Lynn M Stuter
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:30 PM
Subject: Operation Closed Campus; Pottawattamie County,
Iowa; March 26, 2011
Note: this e-mail is being sent to all individuals listed as
the "exercise team" in Operation Closed Campus; additionally all
known interested parties. This e-mail will be distributed
nation-wide with a link to the
Operation Closed Campus document.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
If you are not aware, existing United States law requires that
individuals, known to be in this country illegally, be removed
back to their country of origin; illegally defined as
anyone who is not a citizen of the United States and has entered
this country without obtaining the documents required to do so
legally. Such individuals are known, generally, as illegal
aliens and will be referred to as such here. They are not
undocumented immigrants as an immigrant is someone who has
obtained the documents required to be in the United States legally
and can produce those documents upon request. Please note:
illegal alien does not denote a race, color or creed.
Below is a recap of existing United States law regarding
individuals who enter this country illegally, ie, illegal aliens,
and those who aid and abet their illegal entry and continued
residence in the United States:
8 USC Sec 1325 Illegal entry …shall be
subject to civil and criminal penalties, can be fined and
Section 1324a Hiring, Harboring, Transporting any illegal
alien …guilty of a felony punishable by 10 yrs jail
+ $2,000 fine per illegal alien + forfeiture of property.
Section 1324c Law officers have authority to make arrests
…all officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal
laws shall have authority to make arrests for violation of any
provision of this section.
Section 1644 …no local ordinance, rule or
measure shall stop law enforcement officers from enforcement of
Title 19, USC 1459, Section (f) & (g)illegal entry(f)
Civil penalty of $5,000 for the first violation, and $10,000 for
each subsequent violation(g) Criminal penalty liable for a fine
of not more than $5,000, or imprisonment for not more than 1
year, or both.
Either we have rule of law, as established by the United
States Constitution, or we have anarchy and chaos. Would you not
In the document you have distributed, noted above, you acknowledge
the presence of illegal aliens in the jurisdiction over which you
exercise a fiduciary responsibility. Your obligation, under law,
is clear – illegal aliens must be deported.
That such is not happening, across the United States, is the
subject of growing anger in an America where government policies
have resulted in a situation where Americans are losing their
jobs, their homes, their ability to provide for their families.
As Americans are not able to get jobs, they are watching employers
pay illegal aliens under the table; thus not only hurting
Americans but also exploiting the illegal aliens.
While the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies
acknowledge the presence of approximately 12,000,000 illegal
aliens, that figure is actually almost four times that figure,
closer to 45,000,000. These illegal aliens are given access to
social programs in existence for the purpose of helping need
Americans. As such, the undue stress of illegal aliens accessing
these programs means Americans, who truly need these programs, are
denied due to budget constraints.
On average, 26 Americans die every day due to crimes
committed by illegal aliens. In four months more Americans die at
the hands of illegal aliens than died on September 11, 2001.
Where is the outrage?
Every illegal alien who commit a crime on American soil costs the
American taxpayer, on average, $1,600,000 per crime.
Your proposed exercise makes a very clear statement that you,
individually and collectively, support policies that are
anti-American, anti-United States Constitution, and flaunt the
law, to say nothing of being proposed out of what appears to be
gross ignorance of the realities of the illegal alien invasion of
the United States.
And who you, individually and collectively, target as the
"perpetrator" is anyone who 1) believes in the United States
Constitution and Bill of Rights; 2) believes in the Second
Amendment right to keep and bear arms; and 3) believes in the rule
of law established by the United States Constitution and Bill of
Such does not speak well of any one of you and certainly brings
into question your right, your fitness, to the position you now
hold. And personally, your contention is offensive.
The whole of this exercise smacks of the policies of the bigoted,
race-baiting, anti-American organization, the Southern Poverty Law
Center, with which the Department of Homeland Security has a long
and certainly incestuous history.
Among discerning Americans, it has long been known that SPLC
policies are intended, first and foremost, to fill the SPLC
coffers. To that end, the SPLC has engaged in a campaign of
fear-mongering and race-baiting. Nothing fills the coffers like
fear! At the same time, the amount of money, time, and effort the
SPLC allots to defending those truly living in poverty is
miniscule to non-existent. To say that the SPLC is a fraud would
not be inaccurate.
The DHS has, over the past several years, published policies that
cement its incestuous relationship with SPLC doctrine, right down
to claiming that anyone who voted for Chuck Baldwin, Ron Paul or
Bob Barr in the last presidential election was some kind of
dangerous domestic terrorist; anyone who believes in the United
States Constitution to be a white racist with supremacist
proclivities; and that anyone who opposes the continued presence
in this country of 45,000,000 illegal aliens to be "nativist"
defined as anyone who does not agree with the SPLC's open borders
stance. And while the SPLC labels organizations pandering to
whites as white supremacist, it has no problem with organizations
that pander to perceived minorities. That, of course, is totally
out of sync with the equal rights afforded every American by the
Bill of Rights.
In the case of illegal aliens, most Americans do not oppose legal
immigration; but they do oppose the illegal entry into this
country of anyone, no matter the race. While the view of these
Americans comports with the United States Constitution and
existing laws, agencies such as DHS and race-baiting organizations
like the SPLC are careful that distinction is left out of the
While there has not been one school shooting that incorporates the
exercise scenario you propose, there have been many school
shootings in which the perpetrators had been or were currently on
prescription anti-depressants. And the shooters took their angst
out on those they perceived as the problem including parents who
were teachers. If "real life" is your goal, there is no history
that supports your "exercise scenario".
Your exercise scenario does however, serve to further antagonize
the growing divide being purposely agitated between whites, blacks
and Hispanics; your exercise serves a destructive purpose, not a
constructive purpose. In other words, your exercise scenario
falls right in line with SPLC/DHS propaganda.
That you purposely dis-invited one participant when a complaint
was made, further clarifies your spurious intent.
As an American citizen who believes in the United States
Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and rule of law, I call on you
to change your exercise scenario.
Lynn M Stuter